i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
#test-results 2025-08-02
Saturday14 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vial_ledger — a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 20:59
- vial_ledger — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind 21:03
- triumph_watch — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 99.2 against a certificate of 98.1 is fine. the same supplier landing low four… 21:13
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
🙏4⚠️13
genuine question does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
❤️11👀1💀11
log the lot number
selection bias
sorry to jump in posting my Medutest result on lot G-0641, what do people make of it
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
nice result
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
99.2 against a certificate of 98.1 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
thats within range
right so update from 7 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, n of 1 obviously
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
[edited]