vialroom

#test-results 2025-08-16

Saturday34 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • chain_of_custody — a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 21:51
  • no_appetite_nia — do you test every order or sample it 22:58
  • two_four_ceiling — do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious 23:05

if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1

my sheet has 4 lots from WXT with a spread under a point, which is tight, for what its worth

BR

slightly off topic but anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial

thats within range

1❤️11🎉13

*that should say weekly

assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem, take that with a pinch of salt

BR

quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for

does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones

a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached

1🔥6
MS

right so i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

MM

sorry to jump in weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure, still working it out

the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier

i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice

NA

98.6 against a certificate of 98.1 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

NA

my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ

do you test every order or sample it

lot        bought    purity   assay/label
A-2418     2025-03   99.1%    9.6 / 10mg
A-2601     2025-08   98.7%    9.8 / 10mg
B-0114     2026-01   99.3%    9.4 / 10mg
B-0329     2026-04   98.9%    9.9 / 10mg
TF

the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind

[edited]

my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them

AP

log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture

AP

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

MS

is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit