vialroom

#test-results 2025-08-28

Thursday22 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Batch lookup H-2814: 3 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-11-04. 21:26
  • cricket_or_footy — one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally 22:30
  • net_peptide — i told QST about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 22:52
VB

Batch lookup H-2814: 3 independent reports on file, earliest 2024-11-04.

WV

a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached

TY

if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier

my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them

AA

coming back to this posting my VendorInvestigate result on lot KP-0925, what do people make of it

my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more

how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

AA

the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real

🧊1

log the boring ones

CO

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

🤝1👍2❤️2

a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier

AA

update from 5 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both

NP

i told QST about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due