vialroom

#test-results 2025-11-26

Wednesday27 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Digest for the week of 2025-08-26 has been published. 02:15
  • reta_low_dose — i told MKM about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 03:09
  • chlorhex — is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure 03:26
AT

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

unrelated but a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier

VB

Digest for the week of 2025-08-26 has been published.

RL

i told MKM about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due

RL

if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier

CH

is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure

vial-b-0114-front.png
900 × 1200 · 836 KB · not retained in the public archive
RL

coming back to this my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ

MO

posting my VendorInvestigate result on lot B-0329, what do people make of it

which lab

💀17🔥4👀1

i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, not advice obviously

TY

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

BF

what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern

TY

the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier, for what its worth

a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you

slightly off topic but log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture

BF

a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached

BF

update from 1 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, your mileage will differ

LM

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure