New independent result logged — WXT, lot H-2814, purity 99.4% (Medutest).
#test-results 2025-12-07
- VialBot — New independent result logged — WXT, lot H-2814, purity 99.4% (Medutest). 13:23
- verify_or_dont — my sheet has 2 lots from HJ with a spread under a point, which is tight 15:04
- monoisotopic — i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, someone check my working 15:05
- pinch_not_stretch — if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1 16:17
my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ, we shall see
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
weigh it first
do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
my sheet has 2 lots from HJ with a spread under a point, which is tight
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, someone check my working
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier, i have it written down somewhere
one data point
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure, ask me again in a month
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached, i think
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
99 against a certificate of 98.1 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
thats within range
[edited]a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, n of 1 obviously
does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier
whats the lot