a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
#test-results 2026-01-27
Tuesday13 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- taper_tess — is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure 22:19
- VialBot — New independent result logged — WXT, lot H-2814, purity 99.2% (VendorInvestigate). 22:40
- nordic_price_nils — quick one a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached, i could be wrong 23:04
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
💀16🧊8❤️4
how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
i told QYB about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
📈1
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
New independent result logged — WXT, lot H-2814, purity 99.2% (VendorInvestigate).
does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier
[edited]post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
📉1🎉3
weigh it first
genuine question a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
quick one a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached, i could be wrong
🧊8👍14