a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
#test-results 2026-02-19
Thursday16 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- rotterdam_recon — coming back to this if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier 17:04
- closer_not_simpler — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1 17:07
- week_three_wall — i told QYB about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 17:09
- mg_per_ml — quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for 17:17
- adelaide_assay — my sheet has 3 lots from SWB with a spread under a point, which is tight 17:18
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
*that should say weekly
one data point
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
coming back to this if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
🙏8🔥1
thats a fill problem
i told QYB about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
attach the pdf
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
🙏3📈6🧊6
my sheet has 3 lots from SWB with a spread under a point, which is tight
✅16🙏1❤️1
which lab
when did you buy it
99.4 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1