selection bias
#test-results 2026-03-01
Sunday14 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2418. Nothing logged either way. 17:05
- amylin_amy — i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice 18:20
- amylin_amy — sorry to jump in my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ, for what its worth 21:07
is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share
🤝1
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, happy to be corrected
Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2418. Nothing logged either way.
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier
sorry to jump in posting my VendorInvestigate result on lot G-0641, what do people make of it
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
for the archive coming back after 18 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
✅11🧪1👀17
certificate said 99 and the independent came back 97.4, is that a problem
assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem
sorry to jump in my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ, for what its worth