when did you buy it
#test-results 2026-03-17
Tuesday14 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- reta_resting_hr — i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia 11:02
- cleo_tests — do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious 11:40
- cleo_tests — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind 11:45
- cleo_tests — if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier 11:47
- lot_number_lou — the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real 12:33
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
🧊10🙏13
one data point
test it again
do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious
⚠️1✅4🧊6
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
👍2📉3⚠️11
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
log the lot number
💀1🧊5🙏18
the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real