anyone had a result they think was a lab

result in how do people handle a result on a lot that is long gone, or is that the wrong channel

one result is a data point about that vial, and the vial next to it is a different data point, blind submission, for what it is worth

reference number included is one result on one vial ever enough to change anybody mind, anyone

contradicting my own earlier one the archive is chronological on purpose so you can see when something changed rather than just what it is now, one vial, one data point

i keep the report in the same folder as the order, because a result without its order is nearly useless, i bought it myself, receipts kept

include the reference

is there a sensible way to compare results across labs at all

i have changed my mind on the strength of one result exactly once, and it was a spectacular result

surprised me too

should a result be posted if you cannot prove where you bought it

i have logged results that disagreed with each other by more than i expected and both labs were reputable, one vial, one lab, one date

nice result