blind at the point of the lab is what matters. the organiser knowing is a different and smaller problem
Thread · #test-results · 2025-11-16
a blind submission removes one specific bias and leaves
Spun off from a message in #test-results on 2025-11-16. 9 messages, 5 participants.
The message this came from
- site_itch — reference number included a blind submission removes one specific bias and leaves all the others in place 19:02
lot A-3115 came back i submit under a code and i tell the channel the code afterwards. that is as blind as an amateur can manage
🎉13👀2
one vial, so i have logged results that disagreed with each other by more than i expected and both labs were reputable, that is within what i would expect
paperwork attached if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, nothing gets removed
boring result but posting anyway two labs on the same lot is the only comparison that has ever changed my mind about anything, logged next to the earlier one
numbers are in a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
assay and purity answer different questions, and half the arguments in here are people answering the other one, blind submission, for what it is worth
💀18❤️4
adding this to the log do you test every order or sample it
🧊10
expected this one, logging anyway posting my PeptideMeter result on lot SG-1622, what do people make of it, anyone at all
📈12💀15