certificate said 97.4 and the independent came back 99, is that a problem
anyone had a result they think was a lab
Spun off from a message in #test-results on 2026-05-19. 17 messages, 4 participants.
- batch_bandit — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real 21:22
attach the pdf
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
log the boring ones
update from 25 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both
my sheet has 9 lots from SGN with a spread under a point, which is tight
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
nice result
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
one data point
whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by