same plateau here
#tirzepatide 2024-01-23
Tuesday15 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vial_ledger — SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up, your mileage will differ 17:48
- vial_ledger — i argued the sweet spot was nonsense and then spent 7 months at 7.5 not needing more 19:12
- deadspace — the sweet spot argument is really about effect per side effect, not a magic number plateaued at 33 weeks the same way i did on semaglutide, so i doubt its compound… 20:03
- slow.taper — is 7.5 really the sweet spot or is that just channel folklore 20:12
SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up, your mileage will differ
changed my mind about needing 15, i was chasing a number rather than an outcome, for what its worth
at 12 my appetite is gone entirely, did anyone go down rather than up
i argued the sweet spot was nonsense and then spent 7 months at 7.5 not needing more
transit-times.csv
476 rows · not retained in the public archive
if youre coming off semaglutide the honest answer is start low and find out, theres no table
GIP plus GLP-1
💀4❤️1
start low anyway
the 2.5 to 5 step was the roughest one for me and everything after was easier
SURMOUNT is weight
the trials titrated every four weeks to a target, most people here stop at whatever works
the sweet spot argument is really about effect per side effect, not a magic number
plateaued at 33 weeks the same way i did on semaglutide, so i doubt its compound specific
update on the earlier thing SURMOUNT-1 versus SURPASS-2, which one was the weight trial
no clean conversion