vialroom

#tirzepatide 2025-03-08

Saturday49 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • related_subs — changed my mind about needing 15, i was chasing a number rather than an outcome £38 for a 30 vial is roughly what ive paid for the last year 16:43
  • vat_on_import — the GIP explanation for easier nausea is plausible and i still treat it as a story not a fact 18:21
  • VialBot — Recon calculator: 2mg in 2ml = 4mg/ml. 18:29
GB

no gap when i switched, took the last semaglutide dose and started this a week later, thats just me
the 40 vial in 1.5ml gives 5mg/ml which puts 12 on 12 units, nice round numbers

RS

changed my mind about needing 15, i was chasing a number rather than an outcome
£38 for a 30 vial is roughly what ive paid for the last year

fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 625 KB · not retained in the public archive
👍9
RS

is 7.5 really the sweet spot or is that just channel folklore

🙏2

5 did nothing

GB

if youre coming off semaglutide the honest answer is start low and find out, theres no table

GB

there is no clean conversion between the two, anyone giving you a ratio is guessing, n of 1 obviously

🎉10

SURMOUNT was the weight programme and SURPASS was diabetes, thats the split people mix up, i have it written down somewhere

at 2.4 my appetite is gone entirely, did anyone go down rather than up

TA

does the GIP arm actually explain the easier nausea or is that hand waving

TA

my VendorInvestigate result on a Homopeptide vial came in at 99 which is why i keep buying from them

TA

update on the earlier thing did anyone go past 15 and was there any point to it

WT

the sweet spot argument is really about effect per side effect, not a magic number, anyway

😂1📈2🧊1

restarted at 2.5 after 20 months off and the first two doses reminded me why titration exists
at 15 the GI came back for me, so my easier profile claim only applies below that

TA

update on the earlier thing im at 15 and thinking about 0.5, did anyone gain anything from that step
the GIP explanation for easier nausea is plausible and i still treat it as a story not a fact

VO

update on the earlier thing i log everything and my appetite curve looks flatter across the week than my semaglutide log did

VO

follow up at 1.7 my appetite went completely and i dropped back a step, eating nothing isnt a win

VO

the GIP explanation for easier nausea is plausible and i still treat it as a story not a fact

medutest-report-h-2814.pdf
3 pages · 384 KB · not retained in the public archive
📈2🧊3🎉18
VB

Recon calculator: 2mg in 2ml = 4mg/ml.

📈16🙏1
LM

the trials titrated every four weeks to a target, most people here stop at whatever works

[edited]

the sweet spot thing is survivorship, the people it worked for stayed and said so

SH

follow up the two compounds arent interchangeable week for week even if the effect ends up similar

RS

ok so i sat at 7.5 for 20 months and never needed more, which is where the folklore comes from

switched from 1.7 semaglutide and started at 2.5, took the slow route, never regretted it
the sweet spot thing is survivorship, the people it worked for stayed and said so

12 did nothing extra over 10 for me and that still holds a year later, for what its worth

RS

i argued the sweet spot was nonsense and then spent 21 months at 7.5 not needing more

👍5⚠️5👀12

5 was where i first noticed it properly, 2.5 did almost nothing for me, thats one data point
the sweet spot argument is really about effect per side effect, not a magic number

SH

for the archive the 5 vial in 2.5ml gives 2.5mg/ml which puts 5 on 40 units, nice round numbers, your mileage will differ
plateaued at 33 weeks the same way i did on semaglutide, so i doubt its compound specific

WT

GI was noticeably easier for me than semaglutide at what felt like the same appetite effect, i think

RS

did anyone find the GI easier than semaglutide at an equivalent effect

RS

40 units of a 10 solution is a lot of volume and i check that one twice every single time

did going from 0.25 semaglutide to 5 of this feel like a step down for anyone

[edited]
CC

held 10 for 3 months and lost 6kg over that stretch, slow and boring and fine, anyway

the switch felt like a step down at first and then caught up around week 31
the two compounds arent interchangeable week for week even if the effect ends up similar

is there a reason to titrate slower than the four week schedule

same plateau here