vialroom

#vendor-talk 2025-03-02

Sunday24 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • per_mg_pete — i would order from Homopeptide again and i would still weigh the vials, as i would with anyone 16:32
  • assay_not_purity — is it worth paying more for better paperwork 16:34
  • night_pin — unrelated but what packaging have people had from KP 18:28
  • night_pin — first order from QSC, anything i should know 18:34
  • assay_not_purity — whats the smallest order anyone has placed successfully 19:06
PM

genuine question better paperwork is worth paying for and i did not think that two years ago

i would order from Homopeptide again and i would still weigh the vials, as i would with anyone

TO

ask who actually makes it. about a third of suppliers answer honestly and that answer is worth a lot

PM

quoted lead time versus actual is the number i track. the gap is the informative part

PM

the room does not rank suppliers on price. it ranks them on whether what arrives matches what was described

MW

minimum orders push people into buying more than they want, which is a real cost nobody puts in the per mg number

NP

a reseller relabelling a synthesis house is a different risk profile from the synthesis house

NP

prices move without announcement more often than people expect. screenshot your invoice

a 10mg vial at 38 in a pack of five, plus 25 shipping, is 215 for 50mg. thats 4.30 per mg

MW

my first order from FGP was fine and my fourth was better. they have improved

NP

unrelated but what packaging have people had from KP

👀5

has anyone worked out the actual per mg cost including shipping for KP

first order from QSC, anything i should know

👍17
AN

reordering or trying somebody new, whats the argument for staying
cold packs are not standard everywhere. ask explicitly and it usually costs nothing

TO

i asked for a non standard vial size and got it without a surcharge. that told me more than any certificate

thats the synthesis house

🤝1

update from 10 months ago: switched suppliers on fill consistency, not on purity