vialroom

#vendor-talk 2026-04-18

Saturday25 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • auckland_aliquot — unrelated but i would order from MKM again and i would still weigh the vials, as i would with anyone 21:34
  • coa_or_cope — i have never had a problem i could not resolve with JEEP, which is a low bar and a lot of suppliers fail it 21:39
  • coa_or_cope — a 10mg vial at 38 in a pack of five, plus 25 shipping, is 215 for 50mg. thats 4.30 per mg 21:40
  • lyophile_liv — reordering or trying somebody new, whats the argument for staying 22:34

ask who makes it

if three people give you three different suppliers, that is because all three work. pick one and test it

they slipped

option A: 5 x 10mg @ 38 + 25 ship = 215 / 50mg = 4.30 per mg
option B: 5 x 10mg @ 34 + 45 ship = 215 / 50mg = 4.30 per mg
option C: 10 x 10mg @ 32 + 25 ship = 345 / 100mg = 3.45 per mg
AA

prices move without announcement more often than people expect. screenshot your invoice

VI

the packaging from SGN was the best i have had, double boxed with the tray intact

LL

support answering in two days is good. answering in nine is a data point about the whole operation

VI

update from 14 months ago: switched suppliers on fill consistency, not on purity

AA

unrelated but i would order from MKM again and i would still weigh the vials, as i would with anyone

is ERP the manufacturer or a reseller

better paperwork is worth paying for and i did not think that two years ago

CO

i have never had a problem i could not resolve with JEEP, which is a low bar and a lot of suppliers fail it

🎉9

a 10mg vial at 38 in a pack of five, plus 25 shipping, is 215 for 50mg. thats 4.30 per mg

👀8
VB

Batch lookup B-0329: 5 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-12-17.

LL

cheap per mg is not the same as good value. i have paid more twice and been glad both times

LL

reordering or trying somebody new, whats the argument for staying

transit-times.csv
723 rows · not retained in the public archive