has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
#vendor-verification 2024-01-20
- noct.titrate — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 10:33
- noct.titrate — how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing 10:49
- logrotate — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 14:00
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
[edited]we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, anyway
does TFC being verified mean my vial is fine
how does a supplier get verification revoked
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
*Janoshik not the other one
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
coming back after 10 months, has the standard changed
refresh on evidence
thats evidence
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
log it either way
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, anyway
[edited]what actually counts as evidence for a verification
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
revoked stays in the log
both numbers go in
thats not evidence
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
for the archive two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
update from 16 months ago: QYB added evidence and the entry now reflects it
pattern not one result
never for sale