coming back to this nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, take that with a pinch of salt
#vendor-verification 2024-05-11
Saturday35 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- LC_MS_Lena — does QYB being verified mean my vial is fine 08:51
- lean_mass_lex — somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a… 11:07
- lean_mass_lex — if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score 12:04
- VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 128 messages from 55 members. 12:52
- week_three_wall — update from 17 months ago: SSA added evidence and the entry now reflects it 14:14
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
does QYB being verified mean my vial is fine
📉9❤️13
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
while im here if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
quick one we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
follow up the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
refresh on evidence
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
⚠️2
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
11:58ferrous_ash pinned a message
who decides, the mods or the room
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
⚠️9🎉9🧪1
12:06ferrous_ash pinned a message to this channel
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
sorry to jump in the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, still working it out
how many independent results does a supplier need
coming back after 9 months, has the standard changed
*Janoshik not the other one
not a recommendation
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, i think
Channel stats, last 30 days: 128 messages from 55 members.
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
update from 17 months ago: SSA added evidence and the entry now reflects it
⚠️9👀3
both numbers go in
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more