#vendor-verification 2024-06-09

never for sale

update from 18 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, ill dig out the number

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

lot number or nothing

genuine question i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count

does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from Janoshik

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

update on the earlier thing verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

nothing gets deleted

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones

who decides, the mods or the room

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry

nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes

thats not evidence