i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
#vendor-verification 2024-07-15
Monday24 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- protein_floor — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 15:01
- split_dose_sam — a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all 15:41
- protein_floor — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 15:47
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, thats just me
while im here if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score, from memory
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, take that with a pinch of salt
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
ok so two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
does GGPeps being verified mean my vial is fine
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 52 awaiting dispatch.
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
thats not evidence
📈9🤝3💀6
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
👍18
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
ok so is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
sorry to jump in a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
🔥14👍1
*Medutest not the other one
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 739 KB · not retained in the public archive
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently