thats not evidence
#vendor-verification 2024-09-06
Friday34 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- five_mg_ml — we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern 10:46
- thirty_one_g — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 13:07
- relabel_watch — a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, ask me again in a month 13:10
- relabel_watch — two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers 13:33
- VialBot — Reminder for thirty_one_g: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago. 15:51
log it either way
never for sale
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
📉13
both numbers go in
not a recommendation
11:16tenpence pinned a message to this channel
post the photos
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, ill dig out the number
blinded is better
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
does QYB being verified mean my vial is fine
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
how many independent results does a supplier need
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
for the archive coming back after 13 months, has the standard changed
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
thin evidence
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
🔥1📈15😂12
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, ask me again in a month
fridge-temps.csv
694 rows · not retained in the public archive
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
🤝10😂8
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, thats one data point
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
pattern not one result
Reminder for thirty_one_g: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago.
🧊1
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
thats evidence
⚠️9🙏2
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not