what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
[edited]#vendor-verification 2024-11-17
Sunday28 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- night_pin — update from 14 months ago: JEEP added evidence and the entry now reflects it 23:00
- warsaw_vial — two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers 23:31
- dublin_dose — while im here we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 23:42
- gip_glp_gil — why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored 23:58
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, someone check my working
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
update from 14 months ago: JEEP added evidence and the entry now reflects it
does QSC being verified mean my vial is fine
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
update on the earlier thing a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, i have it written down somewhere
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
thats evidence
🎉2👍1
*that should say weekly
sorry to jump in we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
post the photos
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, your mileage will differ
two_labs_two_answersverification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log…
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
🎉12👍12✅2
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine, someone check my working
genuine question coming back after 13 months, has the standard changed
while im here we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
📉4⚠️2🧊2
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score, take that with a pinch of salt
for the archive a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
✅16