if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
#vendor-verification 2024-12-14
- swirl_not_shake — i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the… 17:11
- factory_direct_fi — does QYB being verified mean my vial is fine 17:55
- lot_number_lou — who decides, the mods or the room 18:42
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
[edited]how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
thats not evidence
refresh on evidence
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, ymmv
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
blinded is better
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
not a recommendation
[edited]a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
does QYB being verified mean my vial is fine
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
lot number or nothing
who decides, the mods or the room
how does a supplier get verification revoked
post the photos
nothing gets deleted