vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-02-04

Tuesday23 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • blind_submit — update from 9 months ago: WXT added evidence and the entry now reflects it 21:59
  • quiet.hours — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 23:29
  • quiet.hours — we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in… 23:30
VL

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited, i think

i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier, not advice obviously

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now

VL

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

IM

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

never for sale

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

while im here a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation

BS

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine, thats just me

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry

QH

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

🙏8

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

👀7