if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, ask me again in a month
#vendor-verification 2025-03-03
Monday29 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- apob_over_ldl — right so what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine 23:13
- apob_over_ldl — update from 16 months ago: ERP added evidence and the entry now reflects it 23:17
- food_noise_off — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 23:21
- vial_ledger — while im here a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 23:22
how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
lot number or nothing
[edited]how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
log it either way
never for sale
update on the earlier thing the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, your mileage will differ
does a good result from Medutest outweigh a bad one from Medutest
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
refresh on evidence
right so somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
thats evidence
thin evidence
right so what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
👍1🔥3🙏16
pattern not one result
update from 16 months ago: ERP added evidence and the entry now reflects it
😂8📉1
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
🔥3
while im here a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
❤️3
not a recommendation
how does a supplier get verification revoked
follow up is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
*PeptideMeter not the other one
post the photos
revoked stays in the log