vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-03-27

Thursday24 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • quiet_head_qi — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, your mileage will differ 12:10
  • lean_mass_lex — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, anyway 12:13
  • amylin_amy — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 12:47
QH

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, your mileage will differ

10🤝4
LM

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted, anyway

📈1🤝4🎉1
LM

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

AA

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

thin evidence

AA

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution

📈9❤️8

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

HL

coming back to this a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, take that with a pinch of salt

AA

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises, i could be wrong

HL

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers, thats just me

log it either way

not a recommendation

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine