the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, i think
#vendor-verification 2025-05-22
Thursday15 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- igf_one_ivy — the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, i think 15:56
- igf_one_ivy — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 16:30
- sharps_comedy — how many independent results does a supplier need 17:31
- sharps_comedy — quick one a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 18:05
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
thats not evidence
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
how many independent results does a supplier need
⚠️9📈1
post the photos
quick one a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
blinded is better
refresh on evidence
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
ok so we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry