thats not evidence
#vendor-verification 2025-05-29
Thursday14 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- no_chargeback — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 20:41
- retention_time — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 20:42
- VialBot — Reminder for retention_time: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago. 20:45
- first_and_last_four — genuine question how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing 21:09
- no_chargeback — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 21:38
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
[edited]i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
Reminder for retention_time: dose day is today. Set 3 days ago.
how many independent results does a supplier need
genuine question how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
📈11🧊18
both numbers go in
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
medutest-report-a-2601.pdf
3 pages · 450 KB · not retained in the public archive
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
👍1
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
how does a supplier get verification revoked
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count