how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
👀7🙏1💀17
#vendor-verification 2025-06-01
Sunday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- ruo_only — how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor 18:50
- bac_water_bill — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 19:19
- vial_ledger — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 19:22
- stack_sceptic — unrelated but if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 19:55
- lipase_lore — we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry 21:36
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
both numbers go in
🧪2
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
slightly off topic but how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
[edited]ok so two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
blinded is better
thin evidence
🔥13💀6
pattern not one result
unrelated but if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
update on the earlier thing has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
while im here does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from Medutest
log it either way
thats not evidence
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier