vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-06-16

Monday18 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • verify_or_dont — what actually counts as evidence for a verification 21:06
  • verify_or_dont — coming back after 21 months, has the standard changed 21:24
  • cold_pack_carla — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 21:27
VO

do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones

weights-monthly.csv
257 rows · not retained in the public archive

pattern not one result

EO

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

👀1⚠️5👍1
EO

update from 24 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it, anyway

VO

genuine question a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

VB

Reminder for cagri_curious: dose day is today. Set 8 days ago.

EO

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

CP

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

⚠️7🤝158

thats evidence

CC

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

CC

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

CC

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

🧊1
P2

why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored

follow up the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now