do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
#vendor-verification 2025-06-16
pattern not one result
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
update from 24 months ago: SWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it, anyway
genuine question a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
Reminder for cagri_curious: dose day is today. Set 8 days ago.
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
coming back after 21 months, has the standard changed
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
thats evidence
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
not a recommendation
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
follow up the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now