vialroom

#vendor-verification 2025-06-27

Friday22 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • never_for_sale — update from 24 months ago: GL Biochem added evidence and the entry now reflects it 22:54
  • reta_resting_hr — coming back to this verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more 23:02
  • reta_resting_hr — a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record 23:06
  • cold_start_cy — slightly off topic but somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log 23:07
SF

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

slightly off topic but a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

revoked stays in the log

NF

update from 24 months ago: GL Biochem added evidence and the entry now reflects it

what actually counts as evidence for a verification

who decides, the mods or the room

🙏1

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

RR

coming back to this verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

👍2📉12📈13

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

3😂1🧪15

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both

never for sale

how many independent results does a supplier need

refresh on evidence

[edited]

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor

SB

ok so i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count

nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes