log it either way
#vendor-verification 2025-08-01
Friday20 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- provincial_pat — does KP being verified mean my vial is fine 19:50
- hydrate_hana — if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score 19:51
- VialBot — Assay note: WXT lot C-4402 reported at 96.8% of label content. 20:05
- hydrate_hana — two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log 20:14
- provincial_pat — somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log 21:23
does KP being verified mean my vial is fine
[edited]if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
🧊1🤝4🎉15
Assay note: WXT lot C-4402 reported at 96.8% of label content.
🧊6🔥1
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
genuine question verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
[edited]who decides, the mods or the room
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
how does a supplier get verification revoked
how many independent results does a supplier need
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
nothing gets deleted
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
*Janoshik not the other one
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
coming back after 12 months, has the standard changed
what actually counts as evidence for a verification