#vendor-verification 2025-09-13

Purity check: no report on file for lot G-0641. Nothing logged either way.

a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record, your mileage will differ

ok so the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

coming back after 24 months, has the standard changed

how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor

thin evidence

a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all

thats not evidence

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, we shall see

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

for the archive verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

nothing gets deleted

both numbers go in

a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel

how many independent results does a supplier need

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine, someone check my working

ok so the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line, someone check my working

revoked stays in the log

Recon calculator: 10mg in 0.5ml = 8mg/ml.

i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, happy to be corrected

lot number or nothing

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises