the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not, ill dig out the number
#vendor-verification 2025-11-08
Saturday16 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- freeze_thaw — a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, someone check my working 10:20
- VialBot — Archive lookup: private_script_pri first appears in this channel on 2025-03-10. 10:23
- private_script_pri — i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier 10:25
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
coming back to this the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
both numbers go in
🧪5🔥3📈3
not a recommendation
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
lot number or nothing
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, someone check my working
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
Archive lookup: private_script_pri first appears in this channel on 2025-03-10.
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
[edited]⚠️9✅18
blinded is better
🙏1👀1❤️2
follow up i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate