nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
#vendor-verification 2025-11-12
Wednesday13 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vial_ledger — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 15:43
- oasis_ola — unrelated but verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 16:05
- oasis_ola — if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 18:31
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
unrelated but verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
right so we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
thats not evidence