unrelated but how does a supplier get verification revoked
transit-times.csv
245 rows · not retained in the public archive
#vendor-verification 2025-12-04
Thursday26 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- revoked_ro — i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count 17:52
- never_for_sale — a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 17:53
- meal_prep_mick — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 18:36
- mag_citrate — coming back after 18 months, has the standard changed 18:59
- mag_citrate — we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern, for what its worth 19:00
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
both numbers go in
does SSA being verified mean my vial is fine
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
[edited]a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
who decides, the mods or the room
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
✅11👀2
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
slightly off topic but we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, still working it out
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
🧪15🎉3🙏3
genuine question verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
blinded is better
unrelated but blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
coming back after 18 months, has the standard changed
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern, for what its worth
😂12📉7