#vendor-verification 2025-12-08

Monday15 messages5 participantstimes are UTC

Highlights from this day

blind_submit — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more 19:09
VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot F-1330. Nothing logged either way. 19:10
mg_per_ml — the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line 21:02

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, we shall see

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

follow up two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

😂2🎉4

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

📈1📉10

Purity check: no report on file for lot F-1330. Nothing logged either way.

👀3✅1

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

is there a version of the log i can read chronologically

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

nothing gets deleted

🎉13📉16✅1

never for sale

genuine question verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern

update from 21 months ago: BCH added evidence and the entry now reflects it, someone check my working

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

✅14⚠️14🙏16