coming back after 26 months, has the standard changed
#vendor-verification 2025-12-30
Tuesday11 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- weather_watch — a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 18:41
- dana_titrates — does QSC being verified mean my vial is fine 20:16
- dana_titrates — for the archive blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 20:19
- verify_or_dont — what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine a good result with bad sample handling gets… 20:22
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
thin evidence
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
🎉3
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
[edited]does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
does QSC being verified mean my vial is fine
for the archive blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record