vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-01-16

Friday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • identity_shift — update from 7 months ago: Homopeptide added evidence and the entry now reflects it 18:55
  • ghk_gia — somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log 19:01
  • ghk_gia — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 19:03
  • rotate_the_site — slightly off topic but nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, i could be wrong 19:41
IS

update from 7 months ago: Homopeptide added evidence and the entry now reflects it

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises

GG

somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

💀12🔥6

has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation

❤️1🔥10📈10

if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score

RT

slightly off topic but nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, i could be wrong

🧪1217
LN

ok so verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

both numbers go in

not a recommendation

👍1🤝6🧊1

refresh on evidence

LN

i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier

RR

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs, happy to be corrected

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers