vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-01-18

Sunday14 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • unsolicited_dm — how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor 12:23
  • ferrous_ash — verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted 13:15
  • confirmations_six — a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 13:34
  • confirmations_six — right so we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, take that with a pinch of salt 13:35

coming back after 23 months, has the standard changed

how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor

the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now

FA

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

*Janoshik not the other one

two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log

[edited]
CS

a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited

thats not evidence