vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-01-30

Friday23 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • tenpence — genuine question somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log 17:25
  • cricket_or_footy — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 17:43
  • homa_ir_hugo — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises what does not count: the supplier certificate… 19:32
  • tenpence — is there a version of the log i can read chronologically 20:40
  • zed_zeroes_in — do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones 20:44
TE

genuine question somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log

🧊1🔥2
CO

verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

📈4🧊1
TE

does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything

how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing

for the archive why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored

HI

blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs

HI

what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

never for sale

nothing gets deleted

vial-b-0329-front.png
900 × 1200 · 482 KB · not retained in the public archive
📉1🙏16
TE

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, anyway

ZZ

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

TE

is there a version of the log i can read chronologically

🙏3

*VendorInvestigate not the other one

ZZ

do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones

❤️310👍3