sorry to jump in does KP being verified mean my vial is fine
#vendor-verification 2026-02-18
Wednesday21 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- glasgow_vial — sorry to jump in does KP being verified mean my vial is fine 09:51
- glasgow_vial — update on the earlier thing the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not 13:20
- two_four_ceiling — coming back to this update from 6 months ago: BCH added evidence and the entry now reflects it 14:38
- nettle_notes — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 15:25
right so a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently, ymmv
thin evidence
pattern not one result
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
thats not evidence
nothing gets deleted
how many independent results does a supplier need
who decides, the mods or the room
blinded is better
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
update on the earlier thing the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
coming back after 15 months, has the standard changed
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
coming back to this update from 6 months ago: BCH added evidence and the entry now reflects it
two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers, anyway
[edited]the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division