vialroom

#vendor-verification 2026-03-14

Saturday24 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • batch_bandit — do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones 10:36
  • blind_submit — what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises 10:48
  • batch_bandit — update on the earlier thing what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves 13:43

do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones

🤝3🙏7🧊1

the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not

we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
update from 5 months ago: WXT added evidence and the entry now reflects it

OO

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything

both numbers go in

BS

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

BB

while im here a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record

the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line

coming back to this nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently

update on the earlier thing what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves

👍118📈5
DD

follow up is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes

AA

verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted

VL

how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing