Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged.
#vendor-verification 2026-04-07
Tuesday20 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Verification log updated: GGPeps — evidence added, status unchanged. 20:21
- lisbon_lot — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more 20:27
- fake_tracking — has anyone ever offered to pay for verification 20:47
- invoice_mismatch — right so do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones 22:24
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
fridge-temps.csv
800 rows · not retained in the public archive
nothing gets deleted
pattern not one result
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
❤️12🎉1
both numbers go in
lot number or nothing
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
log it either way
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
not a recommendation
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
✅1
right so do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
🙏3🧊5📉3
how many independent results does a supplier need
who decides, the mods or the room