how does a supplier get verification revoked
#vendor-verification 2026-05-14
Thursday29 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- manila_meniscus — coming back to this the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division 18:01
- manila_meniscus — what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was… 18:02
- split_shipment — nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes 18:34
- gip_glp_gil — follow up i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier 18:49
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution, i have it written down somewhere
post the photos
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
lot number or nothing
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
coming back to this the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
vial-sg-1177-front.png
900 × 1200 · 247 KB · not retained in the public archive
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
❤️5💀1👍7
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
thin evidence
🧪10🧊11
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
weights-monthly.csv
490 rows · not retained in the public archive
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
follow up i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
⚠️1💀1🤝6
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
log it either way
does QSC being verified mean my vial is fine
nothing gets deleted
Channel stats, last 30 days: 25 messages from 14 members.
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
revoked stays in the log
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
how many independent results does a supplier need
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
ok so verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
[edited]ok so we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
not a recommendation