two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
#vendor-verification 2026-05-26
Tuesday33 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- mhra_unlicensed — the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line 18:08
- munich_mgml — the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, for what its worth 18:27
- pooled_sample — for the archive do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones 19:10
- pooled_sample — if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score 20:24
- pooled_sample — does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 20:27
post the photos
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
✅18🧊3
does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from Janoshik
thats evidence
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
pattern not one result
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes, ymmv
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division, for what its worth
✅1🔥1📉13
never for sale
revoked stays in the log
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
blinded is better
[edited]is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, i have it written down somewhere
nothing gets deleted
how many independent results does a supplier need
for the archive do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
👀16📈14😂7
thin evidence
how does a supplier get verification revoked
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel, n of 1 obviously
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
🤝15⚠️15🎉6
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
🧪3
does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
refresh on evidence