coming back to this i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
#vendor-verification 2026-06-26
Friday22 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
for the archive the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
lot number or nothing
refresh on evidence
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
genuine question what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
🎉8🧊2⚠️5
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
[edited]🎉15😂17📉2
how does a supplier get verification revoked
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
❤️1🔥9
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
[edited]ok so how do you handle a result that is good but the sample handling was poor
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
log it either way
pattern not one result
blinded is better
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
[edited]verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
not a recommendation
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
Purity check: no report on file for lot B-0114. Nothing logged either way.