verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
#vendor-verification 2026-06-28
Sunday16 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- quiet.hours — how does a supplier get verification revoked 14:57
- quiet.hours — update from 14 months ago: Homopeptide added evidence and the entry now reflects it, ill dig out the number 14:58
- belfast_bac — if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score 15:13
pattern not one result
🤝1✅2🔥16
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
how many independent results does a supplier need
not a recommendation
how does a supplier get verification revoked
🔥13🧪13👀17
update from 14 months ago: Homopeptide added evidence and the entry now reflects it, ill dig out the number
📈7🧊4✅7
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
transit-times.csv
122 rows · not retained in the public archive
thin evidence
🔥9
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
👀7
never for sale
🎉1🧊4
coming back after 25 months, has the standard changed
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
🧪4🤝11👍5
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record, ill dig out the number