Skip to transcript

Thread · #vendor-verification · 2025-06-12

genuine question does a supplier certificate on its own

Spun off from a message in #vendor-verification on 2025-06-12. 16 messages, 5 participants.

The message this came from

non_scale_win — genuine question does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything 20:13

peak_splitlab20:15

verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more

power_through_no 20:22

does HJ being verified mean my vial is fine

🧪12✅10

non_scale_win 20:23

do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones

peak_splitlab20:29

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

does JEEP being verified mean my vial is fine

factory_direct_fi 20:37

pattern not one result

😂8🤝6

peak_splitlab20:45

what actually counts as evidence for a verification

factory_direct_fi 20:52

blinded is better

peak_split two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

power_through_no 20:59

two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers

peak_splitlab21:08

how many independent results does a supplier need

🧊16

peak_splitlab21:15

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine

glasgow_vial 21:24

lot number or nothing

[edited]

🧪1⚠️15

non_scale_win 21:26

pattern not one result

👍2🧊15

peak_splitlab21:31

thats not evidence

non_scale_win 21:33

update from 6 months ago: WWB added evidence and the entry now reflects it

peak_splitlab21:37

blinded is better

Sponsored

Analytics platformPeptideMeter — community peptide analytics and supplier ratingsAggregated independent test data with the sample size shown next to every score, which is the only honest way to publish a crowd-sourced rating.Browse results →