does a photograph of a vial next

i dont think thats right, disagreement is the finding

not disproven is not the same as verified and the log keeps those apart deliberately, pattern needs more than one lot

reading back through the log does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything

what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine, both dates stay

a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, i think

correcting my own earlier entry does a supplier publishing their own reports count for anything, or should i ask this elsewhere

thin evidence

building on that a member result and a supplier result are both logged and they are not the same kind of claim

documented, so logging it evidence is a report you can tie to a lot you can tie to a purchase. anything missing from that chain weakens it

the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division

is an invoice part of the chain or is that overkill

a certificate you cannot reproduce is still a document. it just is not a result, the log can be argued with

evidence added, no change i have had an entry of mine corrected by somebody else and the correction sits under it with both dates. that is the system working, boring on purpose

do you log the source of purchase or just the lot, or is that just me